On Thursday,
on February 18, 2010, an occurrence took
place, one that disturbed me greatly - but
not for the same reason it did the vast
majority of other “Americans” - thereby
resulting in
“An Analysis of the Texas Incident”
series of articles. It was that incident
that first “inspired” an uncompleted series
of “pod-casts” - thus far - on “Blog-Talk
Radio”, and subsequently this series of
articles.
A few days
later the following news item was
“discovered”, on the “Internet”, by this
writer: “In an interview with ABC News that
aired Monday, (2/22/10) Stack's daughter,
Samantha Bell, said her father's final
actions were wrong, but she praised his
anti-government stance. When asked if she
thought Stack was a hero, she said, "yes,
because maybe now people will listen," but
later backed off that statement and said
Hunter was the only hero in the attack.”
Did you
notice “dear” reader, the sub-title of this
article series had changed?
Now consider
these words, in conjunction with that last
question: “And when he was demanded of the
Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should
come, he answered them and said, The kingdom
of God cometh not with observation: Neither
shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for,
behold, the kingdom of God is
within you.” [Luke 17:20-21]
Here’s a
little “tid-bit” folks; this WORDOLOGY
“works” forward and backwards. This
WORDOLOGY only “works” forward; it
can not, will not, “work” backwards -
whereas “IT” will only confirm to
individuals - people - that this
WORDOLOGY is the “real deal” -
the primary system of the CREATOR -
that many of this nation’s
founding father’s realized.
Did you also
notice, have you also realized where the
“kingdom of God” - not the
kingdom of heaven - is located? That
question goes back to ONE of the
numerous “systems of God”. For example,
these words from Jesus to a Jewish “religious
expert”: “Marvel not that I said unto thee,
Ye must be born again.” [John 3:7] In other
words, “It’s about all the
words folks”; words such as: “Ye
must be born again.”
However,
this process, this method, “Ye - YOU
- must be born - specifically -
again” - is only the SUPERNATURAL
beginning of two other
basic “Systems of the Creator”,
that start with: “It’s all about
the words folks”. For example,
“…but later backed off that statement.”
Why did
Stack's daughter, Samantha Bell, back off
from her statement of “she thought Stack was
a hero”? Perhaps the answer to that question
starts with these “Old Covenant”
words? “But there is a spirit in
man: and the inspiration of the Almighty
giveth them understanding.” [Job 32:8]
However -
but first - who or what is a “spirit”? Is
the spirit the same “thing” as a soul; but
then what is a “thing”? What is
“inspiration”? Who is inspiration? Then too
who or what is “man”?
Perhaps some
answers can be found in these words: “All
scripture is given by inspiration of God,
and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof,
for correction, for instruction in
righteousness:” [2nd Tim. 3:16]
But then what is “scripture”? Is “scripture”
really what the vast majority of
“Christians” have accepted from the
“church’s” leaders? Who - or what is “God”?
“Questions, questions, and more questions;
good grief man - enough already”; is that
what you are thinking?
Perhaps this
question, from this writer, should be
researched a little further: “Why did
Stack's daughter, Samantha Bell, back off
from her statement of she thought Stack was
a hero”? How about this question as well,
from Joseph Stack: “Why did this have to
happen”?
Actually,
Stack himself answered that question in this
manner: “The simple truth is that it
is complicated and has been coming for a
long time”. How can something that
is “simple truth” be “complicated”? That
question is real easy to answer, once you
realize a Biblical precept - converted
into simple, American “terminology”:
“It’s all about the words
folks”.
“Why did
Stack's daughter, Samantha Bell, back off
from her statement of she thought Stack was
a hero”? That question is real simple to
answer as well, once you realize another
Biblical precept: “It’s about
all the words folks”.
“It’s all
about the words folks” simply pertains to
the political times of nowadays first,
whereas “It’s about all the words folks”
simply pertains first to the religious times
of nowadays. Furthermore, “It’s all about
the words folks” pertains to the “physical”
times of nowadays, whereas “It’s about all
the words folks” pertains to the “spiritual”
times of nowadays.
In other
words, “The simple truth is that it is
complicated…” So here is one manner how
this writer and talker “un-complicates” a
simple truth: “God is an attitude”.
Here is another manner: “God is a
Spirit - not a person”. Those two
simple truths can become complicated -
real fast - if YOU (remember
reason #7 - in part two?) so desire them to
OR if someone
else desires such, and/or something
else wants those two simple truths to be
complicated - something like the
institutions of church and government.
The
preceding paragraph is probably why Joseph
Stack also stated “…and has been
coming for a long time.” Here’s how
this writer and talker “sums up” the
preceding paragraph: “YOU learn
about ‘God’ - but experience the
Creator”!
Was - is -
Joseph Stack a “hero”? Was - is - Joseph
Stack a “patriot”? Was Joseph Stack a
“terrorist”? Was Joseph Stack a “Christian”?
Is Joseph Stack a “martyr”? Yup, more
questions folks! How about this question
however; “Who and what are
you? That last question puts a different
“spin” on “stuff”, doesn’t it? Hence the
political phrase of “spin doctor”.
Martyr,
Christian, terrorist, patriot, and hero are
“words”, are “they” not? But couldn’t those
words be “actions” as well? So, if “IT’S”
not all about the words folks - then
what’s it all about? Is “it” about
power, energy, control, money, love, hate,
fame, politics, religion, judging,
condemning, analyzing, giving, taking - Opps
- more “words”! Do you get it yet folks?
How much
“simpler” can such be stated, and explained,
then this: “It’s all about the words folks”!
But does it stop there however? Absolutely
not! Next comes, “It’s about all the words
folks”! But does it stop there however?
Absolutely not! The next step is some type,
some sort of action. Joseph Stack took some
action. Now the simplistic starts to get
complicated however - merely by asking this
simple two part question: “Was Joseph Stack
a terrorist or patriot”?
While doing
some research during the course of writing -
actually typing this particular article -
this individual came across the following:
“Human beings are compelled to live within a
lie, but they can be compelled to do so only
because they are in fact capable of living
in this way. Therefore not only does the
system alienate humanity, but at the same
time alienated humanity supports this system
as its own involuntary master plan, as a
degenerate image of its own degeneration, as
a record of people's own failure as
individuals”, so stated Vaclav Havel.
As this individual pondered over those
words, I began to wonder who Vaclav Havel
was. Nope, you’ll have to find out for
yourself who that individual was/is - just
as this individual did. These words, “Human
beings are compelled to live within a lie”
are directly related to something and
someone else - a man named Joseph Stack -
and “us”.
Here are some words from a man, now
deceased; his name - Albert Einstein: “When
the solution is simple, God is answering.”
Here are some words from an un-named
individual: “How long, ye simple ones, will
ye love simplicity?” The source for those
words - a book called, entitled the bible.
[See Proverbs 1:22]
There’s an old saying, (cliché) “Charity
begins at home”. Whereas America is often
cited as “the land of the free and the home
of the brave”, does America have any
problems that need a solution? Is that a
“stupid” question, or an “obvious” one to
you readers? Bottom line - only you
can answer that question, for yourself.
Quite obviously however, the vast majority
of Americans think and believe America has
problems! If that is not obvious to you,
another cliché (saying) is applicable to you
- “Are you deaf, dumb, and blind”? Hmmm, I
don’t recall any instance when Jesus
referred to an individual as being “dumb”;
just a “technical point” folks - one related
to this type of “LOVE” (charity).
Joseph Stack related to this type of love in
this manner: “Ross knew all along this
was missing and I didn’t have a clue until
he pointed it out in the middle of the
audit. By that time it had become brutally
evident that he was representing himself and
not me.” Did you read that manner? Did
you see that way? If not, here it is: “…
he was representing himself and not me.”
That is Biblically “called” the love of self
first - a violation of God’s LAW.
Seems to me that was - and still is - some
very typical and common place problems,
especially nowadays! How does it seem to
you? So, what is the solution to those
problems? Oh yeah, here’s something else
Einstein stated: “Politics is for the
present, but an equation is for eternity.”
Back to these words from/by Albert Einstein:
“When the solution is simple, God is
answering.” Here’s the simple solution - an
“equation”: “It’s all about the words
folks”. For example, the word “constitution”
or is IT “Constitution”? Is “God”
answering folks? Are you getting it
yet?
Here’s another simple solution: “God is a
Spirit - not a person.” Here’s God’s “equation”:
1x1x1=1. Here’s another simple solution as
well: “It’s about all the words folks”. Here
is mankind’s equation: 1+1+1=3. Here’s
another simple solution: “How long, ye
simple ones, will ye love simplicity”? Hmmm,
went from some statements and just two
simplistic equations, to a single question.
Starting to get “It” yet people?
Maybe this will help: “Human beings are
compelled to live within a lie, but they can
be compelled to do so only because
they are in fact capable of living in
this way”. Maybe this will help too: “Oh,
and the monsters are the very ones making
and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is
still alive and well today in this country”,
so stated and claimed Joseph Stack in his
“manifesto”, or was “IT” a
“Declaration” - specifically a “dying
declaration” - for all you “legal beagles”
out there, somewhere. Ya get it - that - you
“experts” and professionals?
Hey, maybe this will help too folks:
“Unfortunately after more than 16 years of
school, somewhere along the line I picked up
the absurd, pompous notion that I could read
and understand plain English.” You are
aware of the fact people,
that at the time of the Constitution’s
and the Bill of Rights
“ratifications” - there was no such “thing”
(book, item, etc.) as a “Law Dictionary”?
Getting complicated, huh folks?
Back to “simplicity” folks, “God is
answering.” Do you get IT yet? But
then, who is “God”? Is “God” a philosophy or
an ideology folks? Is “God” a myth? Is “God”
a person or a Spirit”? Is “God” a Spirit or
an attitude, perhaps both? Perhaps the
answers to those questions are found
somehow, someway, using this question: “How
long, ye simple ones, will ye love
simplicity?” [Prov.1:22a]
Incidentally folks, here is something else
Einstein stated and claimed: “If you can't
explain it simply, you don't understand it
well enough.” Now, for those of you who
don’t get it - the simple solution via those
two equations - and for those of you who
practice “Christianism”, consider this.
If you continually want (desire) to “love
simplicity”, then you will always remain a
“simple one”. That’s not “science” folks -
merely ole’ fashion reasoning and common
sense! Here’s the result of remaining
simple: “How long will the scorners delight
in their scorning”? [Prov.1:22b]
Does that “premise” look vaguely familiar,
politically and religiously - especially
to you “Christians”; how about to all you
“Christian activists”? Back to simplicity
“Christians”, and this problem too: “And
fools hate knowledge”? [Prov.1:22c]
Now all you “Christians” know how the bible
“defines” a fool don’t you? If not, go look
it up here: Psalms 14:1 and Psalms 53:1.
Yup, that looking will require some effort
on your part (labor) - unless you are a
bible verse memorizer. There is however
dictionary fools as well - and believe it or
not interpretation and translation fools
too. Do you have this verse memorized also:
Psalms 10:4? So then, what do you see
and realize in that verse?
Back to Joseph Stacks “rants” or writings -
“manifesto” or a declaration?
“We
carefully studied the law (with the help of
some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced
tax lawyers in the business), and then began
to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing
(except that we weren’t steeling from our
congregation or lying to the government
about our massive profits in the name of
God).”
Did anyone notice and realize a “technical”
detail in those words of Mr. Stack? In case
you missed it, here it is - the word
“steeling” - which technically should be the
word “stealing”. Was such a typo and
mis-spelling error - or was there another
purpose in such; perhaps something to help
people to “get it”, i.e. his “message”? [Cf.
Heb.4:12 and Gal.3:24]
Here is another portion of Mr. Stack’s
message: “The intent of this exercise and
our efforts was to bring about a much-needed
re-evaluation of the laws that allow the
monsters of organized religion to make such
a mockery of people who earn an honest
living. However, this is where I learned
that there are two “interpretations” for
every law; one for the very rich, and one
for the rest of us…” Do you see and
realize something - anything - yet people?
[Cf. James 1:8]
Could it possibly be that Jesus - you know,
that person that the vast, vast, majority of
“Christians” think and believe is
“God”, whereas they don’t read so well and
don’t use common sense - could it possibly
be that Jesus “hit the nail on the head”
with these words: “And
in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias,
which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and
shall not understand; and seeing ye shall
see, and shall not perceive:”
[Math.13:14]
How about
this process, this method from Jesus - “Ye -
YOU - must be born again”
- which is only the SUPERNATURAL
beginning of two
basic, NATURAL “Systems of
the CREATOR”, that starts with:
“It’s all about the words
folks”. The second
basic, NATURAL “System
of the CREATOR” is this one:
“It’s about all the words”.
Here’s how
Joseph Stack combined and stated those two
aforementioned natural systems,
aka methods, processes, etc.
1) “The
communist creed: From each according to his
ability, to each according to his need.”
2) “The
capitalist creed: From each according to his
gullibility, to each according to his
greed.”
By the way, here’s another reason why
this writer and talker writes and speaks the
way he does: “For this people's heart is
waxed gross, and their ears are dull of
hearing, and their eyes they have closed;
lest at any time they should see with their
eyes and hear with their ears, and
should understand with their heart,
and should be converted,
and I should heal them.
[Math. 13:15] Incidentally, “who” and
what is that “I”?
Here’s how Thomas Jefferson summarized those
two aforementioned “systems”, as
analyzed, stated, and reiterated,
by Joseph Stack: “That to compel a man to
furnish contributions of money for the
propagation of opinions which he disbelieves
and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.”
Realize folks, there was no “Internal
Revenue Service” in Jefferson’s “time”.
Can you get that folks? Here’s how Albert
Einstein summed up Mr. Stack’s writings -
long before Joseph Stack
implemented “The Stack plan of action”:
“The hardest thing to understand in the
world is the income tax.” Here’s something
else Einstein stated: “Any intelligent fool
can make things bigger and more complex...
It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of
courage to move in the opposite direction.”
So, was Joseph Stack a fool - per Psalms
14:1 - a patriot, or a terrorist, or perhaps
even a genius”? This was “The Stack plan of
action, part one”:
“But I also know that
by not adding my body to the
count, I insure nothing will change. I
choose to not keep looking over my
shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my
carcass, I choose not to ignore what
is going on all around me, I choose
not to pretend that business as usual won’t
continue; I have just had enough.”
This was “The Stack plan of action, part two”:
“I
can only hope that the numbers
quickly get too big to be white washed and
ignored that the American zombies wake
up and revolt; it will take nothing
less. I would only hope that by
striking a nerve that stimulates the
inevitable double standard,
knee-jerk government reaction that results
in more stupid draconian restrictions people
wake up and begin to see
the pompous political thugs and their
mindless minions for what they are.”
Quite obviously - at least to me and
the co-host of “The Bible Mechanic”
alternative radio program currently heard
on/via “The American Voice Radio Network”,
and also one of the co-hosts of the same
program heard on/via “Blog Talk Radio” -
Joseph Stack had reached, to use a cliché,
“his wits end”.
Furthermore, Noel and I concur that Joseph
Stack was no fool - but his actions were the
result of political and religious
desperation. Noel’s assessment was from the
“LOVE” end of the highway, mine by
using the “WORDOLOGY” end of the
highway. Give a listen folks to pod-cast #38
on “Blog Talk Radio” for more on those two
“specialty items” of Love and
Wordology.
We also concur that Stack was a patriot -
not a “terrorist” - specifically a “domestic
terrorist” as evidenced first - only in part
- by these words from Thomas Jefferson, “The
tree of liberty must be refreshed from time
to time, with the blood of patriots and
tyrants. It is its natural manure”, as
well as these words from
John Adams, “Our Constitution was made only
for a moral and religious people. It is
wholly inadequate to the government of any
other”, as well as these words
from James Madison, “When the people fear
the government, you have tyranny. When the
government fears the people, you have
liberty".
However Noel and I concur there were other,
alternative, methods that could have been
used by Mr. Stack. Unfortunately, those
specific, alternative, methods are too
numerous to include in a single article,
hence the metaphorical cliché, “There’s more
then one way to skin a cat”. Pay attention
to the word “metaphorical” folks!
Part three of “The Stack plan of action”
however is the most disturbing part - to me
and Noel; how about you? “Sadly, though I
spent my entire life trying to
believe it wasn’t so, but violence not
only is the answer, it is the only answer.”
There is another answer, as found in 2nd
Chronicles 7:14. Violence is not the only
answer; here’s the place to find another
answer, Mathew 7:12.
Part three of “The Stack plan of physical
action” ends here - at least for him:
“Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try
something different; take my pound of flesh
and sleep well. Hopefully those words -
his words - will become the spark that might
restore the Nation of the United States of
America - for its “posterity”.
People the “Bible” is not a manifesto -
rather the CREATORS Declaration
for mankind and His-kind.
The Bible is not a dictionary, however it is
a book of precepts; nether is IT a
law book. IT is however a book
of LAW, natural and supernatural
Law! “If you can't explain it simply,
you don't understand it well enough.”
However, “How long, ye simple ones, will ye
love simplicity?”
For example: “There is danger from all men.
The only maxim of a free
government ought to be to trust
no man living with power
to endanger the public liberty”,
so wrote former U.S President John Adams. “Enlighten
the people generally, and tyranny
and oppressions of body and
mind will vanish like evil
spirits at the dawn of day”, so
wrote another former U.S President, Thomas
Jefferson.
Perhaps you think this writer and talker is
a “nutcase”? I’ve already stated -by and in
writing and talking - that I am a “Nutcase”.
But seeing such and hearing
such are not the
same; figure that out people! I’ve
also admitted that I’m a “heretic”! Perhaps
you also think that this type of
WORDOLOGY is a figment of my
imagination as well?
Well think and believe what you want! THAT
is not my physical “problem”! THAT
is also YOUR “spiritual”
problem - not mine! In other words
“Intellectuals solve problems, geniuses
prevent them”, that assessment and
conclusion by and from Albert Einstein. This
writer and talker is certainly not an
“intellect”! How many “big” and fancy words
do I use? Figure “IT” out folks!
Again, from the “rants” - another
“technical”, inaccurate use of a word by
Stack: “I find the process of writing
it…” Was “it” a manifesto
or a declaration folks? Figure out that last
question and then “why” also folks. This
writer and talker can relate to these words
from/by Mr. Stack as well: “frustrating,
tedious, and probably pointless”
Pointless, not hopeless folks.
In all probability, most of the creators,
designers, and writer(s) of the U.S.
Constitution - “related” - to those words
from Mr. Stack - those “Founding fathers” of
the nation - now merely
known and recognized around the world as
just the country of “America”
- no longer united as “One
nation under GOD”.
America’s atheists and agnostics have a very
valid “religious argument” with regards to
that phrase: who are the fools now
“Christians”?
What you shall now read - “in a few” -
pertains to all “religious” people; in
particular those who practice “Christianism”,
specifically “name tag” only “Christians”,
but precisely for Christians that
haven’t gotten ALL of
“IT”!
“God is a Spirit”
- not a person - contrary to anyone’s
“professional expert” political and
religious commentary, opinion,
interpretation, teaching, belief, etc.,
and your own personal acceptance
of that fact! Bottom lines:
“Either you believe Jesus or
you don’t! Either you trust “God”
or you don’t! I’ve led you folks to the
WATER - but I won’t force you
to drink! That is your choice, your
decision, your “free will”. [Cf. John 7:38
and John 4:14]
In his own manner, style, and method Joseph
Stack has left behind - for “Constitutional”
and “Godly” people - some
metaphorical “Water”. Here is but one
example of that “water”: “But I
also know that by not adding my body to the
count, I insure nothing will change.”
How many of you folks will “get it”, i.e.
understand that type of “water”? [Cf. John
15:13]
Here’s another example: “Well, Mr. Big
Brother IRS man, let’s try something
different; take my pound of flesh and sleep
well” so wrote Joseph Stack. Did Mr.
Big Brother IRS man actually and
physically take Stacks life - his “pound
of flesh”? To all you “
patriotic Christians” and “Christian
patriots” go read - see what the bible
states - and then see and hear what the
Bible says - to you, via John, chapter ten,
verses 17 and 18 - if you can!
Mr. Stack continues: “…let’s try
something different”. Well this series
of articles, “An Analysis of the Texas
Incident of February 18, 2010”, is something
different! Here is my reason why: “I
saw it written once that the definition of
insanity is repeating the same process over
and over and expecting the outcome to
suddenly be different.”
Yet “insanity” is exactly what the vast,
vast majority of “Christians” have been
doing - using - for about 200 years.
Simplistically stated, they “preach” about
the “sweet bye and bye” with a “pie in the
sky” approach - especially on
the radio and on the television - commercial
and alternative. They seldom deal with
reality and practical application of
Bible precepts that pertain to the “here and
now” as well as the future - aka our
“posterity”.
Furthermore, “We the People” have had our
“chained pulled” since 1804! Go read it for
yourself in the “Constitution for
the United States of America” - in “its” 12th
Amendment. The primary reason, the problem,
for our chain being pulled “one
People” - aka “man-kind” - is this
reason: “God is a Spirit” - not a
person”! As the scientist Einstein stated: “When
the solution is simple, God
is answering.”
For over twenty years this individual has
given many reasons and explanations for
recognizing and solving “problems”
differently - over and over and over again.
During the past five years however, those
reasons have become really “different” -
very specific - and therefore more
“radical”.
This writer and talker decided and chose to
do “stuff” differently, and cease using the
“insanity” method. Nevertheless, the vast
majority of folks still “sleep well”
- but still don’t “get it”; but for how much
longer folks? Are you starting to “get It”
- anything yet people?
“I am finally ready to stop this insanity”,
stated and wrote Joseph Stack. Notice
his words - “I am finally
ready”? The simple, bottom line question is
this: “Are you finally ready too”? Now that
bottom line question starts to become “not
so simple” - in other words “complex” -
really complex!
Here is but one example of such: “The world
is a dangerous place to live; not because of
the people who are evil, but because of the
people who don't do anything about it”, so
stated the scientist Albert Einstein.
So where does someone start to understand
the complex? How about this starting place:
“It’s all about the words folks” - be such
written or spoken?
You
“got” a better “starting” place “buck-a-roo”,
in order to start to “get it”? Perhaps this
next place, method, process, system, step,
idea that might help you to “get it” is
this: “It’s about all the
words folks”? Albert Einstein once stated:
“If you can't explain it simply, you don't
understand it well enough.” Has the
Light come on yet?
Here’s how Joseph Stack saw the “light”:
“I saw it written once that the definition
of insanity is repeating the same process
over and over and expecting the outcome to
suddenly be different.”
Here is how Albert Einstein, the
“scientist”, had explained - defined - the
practice of “insanity”: doing the
same thing over and over again and expecting
different results.
Here is how the online Merriam-Webster
Dictionary defines “insanity”:
1: - a deranged state of the mind usually
occurring as a specific disorder (as
schizophrenia)
2: - such unsoundness of mind or lack of
understanding as prevents one from having
the mental capacity required by law to enter
into a particular relationship, status, or
transaction or as removes one from criminal
or civil responsibility
3: a - extreme folly or unreasonableness b :
something utterly foolish or unreasonable.
Take your pick folks, which version of
“dictionary insanity” is applicable to the
times of today, the “words” or the
“practice” - as explained by Einstein?
Specifically, do you think the
aforementioned #1 dictionary definition
applies to Joseph Stack? If you do, then
you’ll think and believe Mr. Stack was a
terrorist - a madman - a lunatic.
Oh, yeah then most of this nation’s
“founding fathers” had to be
terrorists also. For example: “The right of
a nation to kill a tyrant in case of
necessity can no more be doubted than to
hang a robber, or kill a flea”, so stated
John Adams. “The strongest reason for the
people to retain the right to keep and bear
arms is, as a last resort, to protect
themselves against tyranny in government”,
so stated Thomas Jefferson.
Incidentally, here’s what the Bible states
about double mindedness: “A double minded
man is unstable in all his ways.” [James
1:8] Hmmm, that was the same “dude” who
stated: “Thou believest that there is one
God; thou doest well…” [James 2:19] How
many “Gods” folks? Do you get
IT yet?
Are you doing well nowadays folks? Does
America have any problems nowadays people?
Rather strange that the vast majority of
“Christians” believe in three Gods, while
the devils only believe in one God. By the
way, why do you suppose that even though the
“devils” believe in one God they
“tremble”?
Read it again folks: “Thou believest that
there is one God; thou doest well: the
devils also believe, and tremble.” You think
that Bible verse is hard to
understand “people”? So how come Albert
Einstein once stated and claimed: “The
hardest thing to understand in the world is
the income tax.” You do realize the bible is
a “thing”, do you not folks?
You do realize people that the “IRS” is also
a thing too; how about their “tax laws”, or
are those “laws” supposed to be - “We the
Peoples” - not merely those of the
politicians - those “pompous
political thugs and their mindless minions”
- per Joseph Stacks experiences?
Getting a “message” yet folks - any type of
a message”? Or maybe this writer and talker
is also “insane” - by American “dictionary
definition” - just like the vast majority of
“folks” have been persuaded to think and
believe about Joseph Stack - via his words
and actions?
Incidentally, was Thomas Jefferson
“dictionary definition” insane as well? “I
have sworn upon the altar of God eternal
hostility against every form of tyranny over
the mind of man”. How could Jefferson swear
“eternal” hostility? How would
that be possible? Jefferson must have been
insane, you think - and believe - folks?
Perhaps the answer to that last question
also came from Thomas Jefferson as well:
"The Christian religion, when divested of
the rags in which they [the clergy] have
enveloped it, and brought to the original
purity and simplicity
of it's benevolent institutor, is a religion
of all others most friendly to liberty,
science, and the freest expansion of the
human mind.”
Yup, just like Joseph Stack figured out this
political and religious reality -
“The simple truth is that it
is complicated and has been
coming for a long time” - so has this “Nutcase”!
So did Thomas Jefferson: “That to love God
with all thy heart and thy neighbor as
thyself is the sum of religion”.
TO BE CONTINUED
"Love your neighbor as yourself, and your
country more than yourself."
Thomas Jefferson